Age of Empires is the critically acclaimed, award winning Real Time Strategy (RTS) game with a legac Mehr anzeigen. CommunityAlle ansehen. Highlights. Empires & Puzzles ist eine ganz neue Art von RPG-Spiel, bei dem 3-Gewinnt-Kämpfe und Aufbaustrategie verbunden werden – garniert mit spannenden. Empires & Puzzles. Gefällt Mal · Personen sprechen darüber. Battle through a world of adventure in Empires & Puzzles! Join the battle.
Age of Empires III: Definitive EditionEmpires & Puzzles ist eine ganz neue Art von RPG-Spiel, bei dem 3-Gewinnt-Kämpfe und Aufbaustrategie verbunden werden – garniert mit spannenden. sieh dir Screenshots an und erfahre mehr über Forge of Empires. Lade Forge of Empires und genieße die App auf deinem iPhone, iPad und iPod touch. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Vgl. Jürgen Osterhammel,»Symbolpolitik und imperial Integration: Das britische Empire im und Jahrhundert«, in.
Empires Jogos de estratégia em navegador como Forge of Empires são grandes destaques VideoAlicja - Empires - Interval Act - Junior Eurovision 2020
Cs Go Roulette Free Coins Sie kГnnen Cs Go Roulette Free Coins noch Casinospiele auf anderen GerГten von Apple. - Browser-Strategiespiele wie Forge of Empires sind etwas ganz Besonderes.Gemeinsam mit unseren zuverlässigen Partnern nutzen wir Cookies und Technologien, mit denen wir dir ein individuelles Erlebnis und auf deine Interessen angepasste Werbung bieten können.
Oxford: Oxford University Press. Poland-Lithuania was another country which experienced its 'Golden Age' during the sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries.
The realm of the last Jagiellons was absolutely the largest state in Europe. London [u. The multinational character of the Habsburg monarchy was comparable to that of the Commonwealth [ Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland.
Chicago: Britannica Educational Publishing. Lithuania was also a powerful empire and dominated much of eastern Europe in the 14th—16th centuries in close alignment with Poland; then, from , it was part of a confederation with Poland [ In Skutsch, Carl ed.
Encyclopedia of the World's Minorities. New York [u. It was indeed an Eastern European empire, a multiethnic and multicultural state with great economic strength and strong military power, controlling most of central and eastern European politics.
In Davies, Brian L. Warfare in Eastern Europe, — History of Warfare. Boston: Brill. In terms of territorial expanse in Europe the Polish-Lithuanian state was surpassed only by Russia and the Ottoman Empire and in respect to population was behind only France, Spain, and the German Empire.
Continuum Studies in Military History. Poland-Lithuania had entered the seventeenth century as one of the great powers in Eastern Europe.
Lanham: Lexington Books. Crisis and Reform in Eastern Europe. Transaction Publishers. Empires largest in India Ancient great powers Medieval great powers Modern great powers European colonialism African empires.
The empire on which the sun never sets "Empire" as a description of foreign policy American empire Soviet Empire. Categories : Empires Former empires History-related lists.
Hidden categories: Pages with citations lacking titles Pages with citations having bare URLs Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Incomplete lists from December Articles containing German-language text All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from February Namespaces Article Talk.
Views Read Edit View history. Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file. Download as PDF Printable version. Achaemenid Empire.
The first Persian empire, and the largest one in classical antiquity , founded by Cyrus the Great. Afsharid Dynasty. Founded by Nader Shah , at its peak expanded Persia as far west as Baghdad, and as far east as Delhi.
Baghdad , Raqqa , Kufa , Samarra , Anbar. Successor of the Umayyad Caliphate. North East India. Charaideo , Garhgaon , Rangpur Ahom capital , Jorhat.
It is well known for maintaining its sovereignty for nearly years and successfully resisting Mughal expansion in Northeast India. Succeeded by the Ethiopian Empire.
Marrakech , Seville. Aghmat — , Marrakech — England , France. No official capital. Court was generally held at Angers and Chinon. Tigranes the Great took the title King of Kings.
Assur , later Nineveh. Preceded by the Holy Roman Empire. Austria , Hungary. Vienna , Budapest. Often referred to as the "Austro-Hungarian Empire".
Cairo , Damascus , Hama. Founded by Saladin , See also List of Muslim states and dynasties. The capital of Mexico , Mexico City , is built on the ruins of Tenochtitlan.
Shiladitya ruler of Malwa. Babylonian Empire. See also Neo-Babylonian Empire. North Korea , Manchuria.
Belgian colonial empire. The kingdom was founded by Mayurasharma in C. The continuation of the Kanem Empire. Britannic Empire. Was a break-away state of the Roman Empire.
See also the Carausian Revolt. The largest empire in world history. Precursor to the modern Commonwealth of Nations.
Empire though the word empire has fallen into disuse when describing British overseas possessions still continues in the form of British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies.
Indian Subcontinent. Calcutta — , New Delhi — Governed by the Crown and part of the British Empire. Queen Victoria was proclaimed Empress of India in Not specified, possibly Kota Batu.
First Bulgarian Empire. Balkans , Eastern Europe and Central Europe. Pliska — , Preslav — , Skopie — , Ohrid — Founded by Khan Asparukh.
Second Bulgarian Empire. Successor of the First Bulgarian Empire. Theorically vassal of France. Ruled a very large territory from Alps to North Sea. The eastern half of the Roman Empire.
Term conventionally used since the 19th century to describe the Greek -speaking Roman Empire during the Middle Ages.
Carthaginian Empire. Cebu Rajahnate. An Indianized state founded by a minor Chola prince. Almaliq , Qarshi. Vanchi Muthur , Karur , Kodungallur , Kollam.
Uraiyur , Pazhaiyaarai , Thanjavur , Gangaikonda Cholapuram. Commonwealth of England. Short puritan and republican period in Britain. The Cromwell's army conquered Ireland and Jamaica.
Vivi then Boma. Private kingdom of Leopold II. Annexed by Belgium after the revelation of committed atrocities in rubber plantations.
One of the last Turkic kingdoms, annexed by Russia. Danish colonial empire. Denmark as Denmark—Norway — See also Danish overseas colonies. Kandahar , Kabul.
Egyptian Empire. South West Iran. Fatimid Caliphate. Mahdia — , Cairo — French colonial empire. Some consider the Empire ending with the end of French presence in Vanuatu see New Hebrides France still maintains overseas possessions in the form of Overseas France.
Major commercial power during the Late Middle Ages. Established colonies across the Mediterranean and Black Sea. Kutaisi , Tbilisi.
Established in as an unified kingdom. Spanning a period of about ten generations, each went through 7 Stages of Empire: .
Glubb noted that in all these example, the penultimate age was marked by defensiveness, pessimism, materialism, frivolity, an influx of foreigners, the Welfare State, and a weakening of religion.
He attributed this decadence to an excessively long period of wealth and power, selfishness, love of money, and the loss of a sense of duty. Mike Maloney , an economist, arrived at exactly the same conclusion but in Economic terms whilst studying the history of money.
His 7 stages were: . Empires have been the dominant international organization in world history :. The fact that tribes, peoples, and nations have made empires points to a fundamental political dynamic, one that helps explain why empires cannot be confined to a particular place or era but emerged and reemerged over thousands of years and on all continents.
It is the nation-state—an essentially 19th-century ideal—that is the historical novelty and that may yet prove to be the more ephemeral entity.
In fact, it is a very distorted view of even the Westphalian era not to recognize that it was always at least as much about empires as it was states.
Almost all of the emerging European states no sooner began to consolidate than they were off on campaigns of conquest and commerce to the farthest reaches of the globe… Ironically, it was the European empires that carried the idea of the sovereign territorial state to the rest of the world Empire has been the historically predominant form of order in world politics.
Looking at a time frame of several millennia, there was no global anarchic system until the European explorations and subsequent imperial and colonial ventures connected disparate regional systems, doing so approximately years ago.
Prior to this emergence of a global-scope system, the pattern of world politics was characterized by regional systems. These regional systems were initially anarchic and marked by high levels of military competition.
But almost universally, they tended to consolidate into regional empires Thus it was empires—not anarchic state systems—that typically dominated the regional systems in all parts of the world Within this global pattern of regional empires, European political order was distinctly anomalous because it persisted so long as an anarchy.
Similarly, Anthony Pagden , Eliot A. Cohen , Jane Burbank and Frederick Cooper estimate that "empires have always been more frequent, more extensive political and social forms than tribal territories or nations have ever been".
Empires have played a long and critical part in human history Rome was evoked as a model of splendor and order into the Twentieth century and beyond… By comparison, the nation-state appears as a blip on the historical horizon, a state form that emerged recently from under imperial skies and whose hold on the world's political imagination may well prove partial or transitory… The endurance of empire challenges the notion that the nation-state is natural, necessary, and inevitable Political scientist Hedley Bull wrote that "in the broad sweep of human history The history of interstate relations was largely that of successive great empires.
The pattern of international political change during the millennia of the pre-modern era has been described as an imperial cycle World politics was characterized by the rise and decline of powerful empires, each of which in turn unified and ordered its respective international system.
The recurrent pattern in every civilization of which we have knowledge was for one state to unify the system under its imperial domination.
The propensity toward universal empire was the principal feature of pre-modern politics. Historian Michael Doyle who undertook an extensive research on empires extended the observation into the modern era:.
Empires have been the key actors in world politics for millennia. They helped create the interdependent civilizations of all the continents Imperial control stretches through history, many say, to the present day.
Empires are as old as history itself They have held the leading role ever since. Expert on warfare Quincy Wright generalized on what he called "universal empire"—empire unifying all the contemporary system:.
Balance of power systems have in the past tended, through the process of conquest of lesser states by greater states, towards reduction in the number of states involved, and towards less frequent but more devastating wars, until eventually a universal empire has been established through the conquest by one of all those remaining.
German Sociologist Friedrich Tenbruck finds that the macro-historic process of imperial expansion gave rise to global history in which the formations of universal empires were most significant stages.
The overall conclusion was that the balance of power was inherently unstable order and usually soon broke in favor of imperial order.
When this [imperial] pattern of political history is found in the New World as well as in the Old World, it looks as if the pattern must be intrinsic to the political history of societies of the species we call civilizations, in whatever part of the world the specimens of this species occur.
If this conclusion is warranted, it illuminates our understanding of civilization itself. Most states systems have ended in universal empire, which has swallowed all the states of the system.
The examples are so abundant that we must ask two questions: Is there any states system which has not led fairly directly to the establishment of a world empire?
Does the evidence rather suggest that we should expect any states system to culminate in this way? It might be argued that every state system can only maintain its existence on the balance of power , that the latter is inherently unstable, and that sooner or later its tensions and conflicts will be resolved into a monopoly of power.
The earliest thinker to approach the phenomenon of universal empire from a theoretical point of view was Polybius :. In previous times events in the world occurred without impinging on one another Fichte , having witnessed the battle at Jena in when Napoleon overwhelmed Prussia, described what he perceived as a deep historical trend:.
There is necessary tendency in every cultivated State to extend itself generally Such is the case in Ancient History As the States become stronger in themselves and cast off that [Papal] foreign power, the tendency towards a Universal Monarchy over the whole Christian World necessarily comes to light This tendency Whether clearly or not—it may be obscurely—yet has this tendency lain at the root of the undertakings of many States in Modern Times Although no individual Epoch may have contemplated this purpose, yet is this the spirit which runs through all these individual Epochs, and invisibly urges them onward.
Fichte's later compatriot, Geographer Alexander von Humboldt — , in the mid-Nineteenth century observed a macro-historic trend of imperial growth in both Hemispheres: "Men of great and strong minds, as well as whole nations, acted under influence of one idea, the purity of which was utterly unknown to them.
Friedrich Ratzel , writing at the same time, observed that the "drive toward the building of continually larger states continues throughout the entirety of history" and is active in the present.
His seventh law stated: "The general trend toward amalgamation transmits the tendency of territorial growth from state to state and increases the tendency in the process of transmission.
Two other contemporaries— Kang Yu-wei and George Vacher de Lapouge —stressed that imperial expansion cannot indefinitely proceed on the definite surface of the globe and therefore world empire is imminent.
Kang Yu-wei in believed that the imperial trend will culminate in the contest between Washington and Berlin  and Vacher de Lapouge in estimated that the final contest will be between Russia and America in which America is likely to triumph.
This undoubtedly is the logical final stage in the geopolitical theory of evolution. The world is no longer large enough to harbor several self-contained powers The trend toward world domination or hegemony of a single power is but the ultimate consummation of a power-system engrafted upon an otherwise integrated world.
And the onrush of this trend may not come to rest until it has asserted itself throughout our planet The global order still seems to be going through its birth pangs With the last tempest barely over, a new one is gathering.
The year after the War and in the first year of the nuclear age, Albert Einstein and British Philosopher Bertrand Russell , known as prominent pacifists, outlined for the near future a perspective of world empire world government established by force.
Einstein believed that, unless world government is established by agreement, an imperial world government would come by war or wars. Russian colleague of Russell and Neighbour, Georgy Fedotov , wrote in All empires are but stages on the way to the sole Empire which must swallow all others.
The only question is who will build it and on which foundations. Universal unity is the only alternative to annihilation.
Unity by conference is utopian but unity by conquest by the strongest Power is not and probably the uncompleted in this War will be completed in the next.
Originally drafted as a secret study for the Office of Strategic Services the precursor of the CIA in  and published as a book three years later, The Struggle for the World The historical stage for a world empire had already been set prior to and independently of the discovery of atomic weapons but these weapons make a world empire inevitable and imminent.
A world empire "is in fact the objective of the Third World War which, in its preliminary stages, has already began".
The issue of a world empire "will be decided, and in our day. In the course of the decision, both of the present antagonists may, it is true, be destroyed, but one of them must be.
Today war has become an instrument of universal destruction, an instrument that destroys the victor and the vanquished At worst, victor and loser would be undistinguishable under the leveling impact of such a catastrophe At best, the destruction on one side would not be quite as great as on the other; the victor would be somewhat better off than the loser and would establish, with the aid of modern technology, his domination over the world.
The outcome of the Third World War This denouement was foreshadowed, not only by present facts, but by historical precedents, since, in the histories of other civilizations, the time of troubles had been apt to culminate in the delivery of a knock-out blow resulting in the establishment of a universal state The year this volume of A Study of History was published, US Secretary of State John Foster Dulles announced " a knock-out blow " as an official doctrine, a detailed Plan was elaborated and Fortune magazine mapped the design.
Another term applied by the strategists was "Sunday punch". A pupil of Toynbee, William McNeill , associated on the case of ancient China, which "put a quietus upon the disorders of the warring states by erecting an imperial bureaucratic structure The warring states of the Twentieth century seem headed for a similar resolution of their conflicts.
Chinese classic Sima Qian d. He did not use the term bacchanal but he coined on the occasion an associating word: "Gentlemen, you do not have a war plan.
You have a wargasm! According to the circumscription theory of Robert Carneiro , "the more sharply circumscribed area, the more rapidly it will become politically unified.
Correspondingly, these are the three most circumscribed civilizations in human history. The Empires of Egypt established by Narmer c.
German Sociologist Friedrich Tenbruck, criticizing the Western idea of progress, emphasized that China and Egypt remained at one particular stage of development for millennia.
This stage was universal empire. The development of Egypt and China came to a halt once their empires "reached the limits of their natural habitat".
Carneiro explored the Bronze Age civilizations. Stuart J. Kaufman, Richard Little and William Wohlforth researched the next three millennia, comparing eight civilizations.
They conclude: The "rigidity of the borders" contributed importantly to hegemony in every concerned case.
The circumscription theory was stressed in the comparative studies of the Roman and Chinese Empires. The circumscribed Chinese Empire recovered from all falls, while the fall of Rome, by contrast, was fatal.
The ancient Chinese system was relatively enclosed, whereas the European system began to expand its reach to the rest of the world from the onset of system formation… In addition, overseas provided outlet for territorial competition, thereby allowing international competition on the European continent to He explained the durability of the European states system by its overseas expansion: "Overseas expansion and the system of states were born at the same time; the vitality that burst the bounds of the Western world also destroyed its unity.
In the nineteenth century, he wrote during the Second World War, imperialist wars were waged against "primitive" peoples. Since , however, this has no longer been possible: "the situation has radically changed".
Now wars are between "imperial powers. For example, the more attention Russia, France and the United States paid to expanding into far-flung territories in imperial fashion, the less attention they paid to one another, and the more peaceful, in a sense, the world was.
But by the late nineteenth century, the consolidation of the great nation-states and empires of the West was consummated, and territorial gains could only be made at the expense of one another.
Herz outlined one "chief function" of the overseas expansion and the impact of its end:. Thus the openness of the world contributed to the consolidation of the territorial system.
The end of the 'world frontier' and the resulting closedness of an interdependent world inevitably affected the system's effectiveness.
Some later commentators [ who? For some commentators, the passing of the Nineteenth century seemed destined to mark the end of this long era of European empire building.
The unexplored and unclaimed "blank" spaces on the world map were rapidly diminishing The "closure" of the global imperial system implied The opportunity for any system to expand in size seems almost a necessary condition for it to remain balanced, at least over the long haul.
Far from being impossible or exceedingly improbable, systemic hegemony is likely under two conditions: "when the boundaries of the international system remain stable and no new major powers emerge from outside the system.
The geopolitical condition of "global closure"  will remain to the end of history. Since "the contemporary international system is global, we can rule out the possibility that geographic expansion of the system will contribute to the emergence of a new balance of power, as it did so many times in the past.
One of leading experts on world-system theory , Christopher Chase-Dunn , noted that the circumscription theory is applicable for the global system, since the global system is circumscribed.
Given "constant spatial parameters" of the global system, its unipolar structure is neither historically unusual nor theoretically surprising.
Randall Schweller theorized that a "closed international system", such as the global became a century ago, would reach " entropy " in a kind of thermodynamic law.
Once the state of entropy is reached, there is no going back. The initial conditions are lost forever. Stressing the curiosity of the fact, Schweller writes that since the moment the modern world became a closed system, the process has worked in only one direction: from many poles to two poles to one pole.
Thus unipolarity might represent the entropy—stable and permanent loss of variation—in the global system.
Chalmers Johnson argues that the US globe-girding network of hundreds of military bases already represents a global empire in its initial form:.
For a major power, prosecution of any war that is not a defense of the homeland usually requires overseas military bases for strategic reasons.
After the war is over, it is tempting for the victor to retain such bases and easy to find reasons to do so. Commonly, preparedness for a possible resumption of hostilities will be invoked.
Simon Dalby associates the network of bases with the Roman imperial system:. That [military] presence literally builds the cultural logic of the garrison troops into the landscape, a permanent reminder of imperial control.
Kenneth Pomeranz and Harvard Historian Niall Ferguson share the above-cited views: "With American military bases in over countries, we have hardly seen the end of empire.
Conventional maps of US military deployments understate the extent of America's military reach. A Defense Department map of the world, which shows the areas of responsibility of the five major regional commands , suggests that America's sphere of military influence is now literally global … The regional combatant commanders— the 'pro-consuls' of this imperium —have responsibility for swaths of territory beyond the wildest imaginings of their Roman predecessors.
Another Harvard Historian Charles S. Compared with which, the foundation of the Macedonian, the Roman and the British, sink into insignificance.
Nothing has ever existed like this disparity of power. The Pax Britannica was run on the cheap. The Roman Empire stretched further afield, but there was another great empire in Persia and a larger one in China.
There is … no comparison. Times Atlas of Empires numbers 70 empires in the world history. Niall Ferguson lists numerous parallels between them and the United States.
All dominant empires thought they were special. In , Historian Ludwig Dehio predicted global unification due to the circumscription of the global system, although he did not use this term.
Being global, the system can neither expand nor be subject to external intrusion as the European states system had been for centuries:.
In all previous struggles for supremacy, attempts to unite the European peninsula in a single state have been condemned to failure primarily through the intrusion of new forces from outside the old Occident.
The Occident was an open area. But the globe was not, and, for that very reason, ultimately destined to be unified… And this very process [of unification] was clearly reflected in both World Wars.
Fifteen years later, Dehio confirmed his hypothesis: The European system owed its durability to its overseas outlet. During the same time, Quincy Wright developed a similar concept.
Balance-of-power politics has aimed less at preserving peace than at preserving the independence of states and preventing the development of world empire.
In the course of history, the balance of power repeatedly reemerged, but on ever-wider scale. Eventually, the scale became global. Five scholars— Hornell Hart ,  Raoul Naroll ,  Louis Morano,  Rein Taagepera  and the author of the circumscription theory Robert Carneiro   —researched expanding imperial cycles.
They worked with historical atlases but the advent of YouTube provided us with a better visualization.
Naroll and Carneiro found that this time is close at hand: around the year and respectively. No imperialism, but technical and strategic problems of security urge America to rule the skies of the globe, just as Britain during the last century ruled the seas of the world… Pacifists and anti-imperialists will be shocked by this logic.
They will try to find an escape. But they will try in vain… At the end of the war the crushing superiority of American plane production will be an established fact… The solution of the problem … is by no means ideal, nor even satisfactory.
But it is the minor evil… . This period would be necessary transitory stage before World State is eventually established, though he did not specify how the last transformation is expected to occur.
Coudenhove-Kalergi's follower in the teleological theory of World State, Toynbee, supposed the traditional way of universal conquest and emphasized that the world is ripe for conquest: "…Hitler's eventual failure to impose peace on the world by the force of arms was due, not to any flaw in his thesis that the world was ripe for conquest, but to an accidental combination of incidental errors in his measures…" But "in falling by so narrow a margin to win the prize of world-dominion for himself, Hitler had left the prize dangling within the reach of any successor capable of pursuing the same aims of world-conquest with a little more patience, prudence, and tact.
For a post-Hitlerian empire-builder, Hitler's derelict legacy was a gift of the Gods. Dissociating America from Rome, Eisenhower gave a pessimistic forecast.
What we must do is to assist these [West European] peoples. The ultimate form of empire was described by Michael Doyle in his Empires.
It is empire in which its two main components—the ruling core and the ruled periphery—merged to form one integrated whole. At this stage the empire as defined ceases to exist and becomes world state.
Doyle examplifies the transformation on the case of the Roman Emperor Caracalla whose legislation in AD extended the Roman citizenship to all inhabitants of the Mediterranean world.
The article is partly a reply on the published a year earlier bestseller The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers which predicted imminent US "imperial overstretch.
Envisaging a world empire of either the United States or the Soviet Union whoever is victorious in World War III , Bertrand Russell projected the Roman scenario too: "Like the Romans, they will, in the course of time, extend citizenship to the vanquished.
There will then be a true world state, and it will be possible to forget that it will have owed its origin to conquest. Both "were good auguries for the prospect that, in a post-Modern chapter of Western history, a supranational commonwealth originally based on the hegemony of a paramount power over its satellites might eventually be put on the sounder basis of a constitutional partnership in which all the people of all the partner states would have their fare share in the conduct of common affairs.
Historian Maks Ostrovski finds above mentioned cosmopolitan reformations to be the characteristic fate of persistent empires. When such a reformation occurs in our world, he writes, the green card would be abolished since all earth inhabitants would have it by birth.
This cosmopolitan World State, as the records of earlier circumscribed civilizations suggest, will last millennia. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Multiple states under one central authority. This article is about the political and historical term. For other uses, see Empire disambiguation.
Monarchy vs. Authoritarian vs. Global vs. Unitary state Empire Principality. Client state. Confederation Devolution Federation Superstate Supranational union.
International relations. Small power Regional power Middle power Great power Superpower. Mongol Empire in the 13th century.
Almohad Empire - Bulgarian Empire in This section does not cite any sources. In the beginning you settle in the Stone Age with only a few huts.
Then, with the right strategy you develop your capital and expand your online empire by conquering nearby provinces. When you log out of this online browser game, your empire and the world around it will continue to produce goods and troops which you can collect to use for your expansion as soon as you come back.
Conflicts are settled on the field of honor and fought as turn-based strategic hexagon battles in which you command your troops right in your browser.
More Games:. Play now Elvenar. Warlords of Aternum. Tribal Wars 2. Connect with Facebook Google Apple.